Making informed decisions on the California propositions can be challenging. To help voters navigate the complexities of the upcoming ballot, the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board has released its voter guide, offering clear recommendations on each proposition. This guide breaks down the LA Times’ endorsements, providing a concise overview to help you cast your vote with confidence.
Los Angeles Times Recommendations: Vote YES
The Los Angeles Times recommends a YES vote on the following propositions:
-
Proposition 2: School Bonds. This $10 billion bond aims to address the dire need for repairs and upgrades in California’s public schools and community colleges. Many of these institutions are currently facing issues like outdated facilities and lack of essential amenities such as air conditioning. Voting yes on Proposition 2 is an investment in the state’s educational infrastructure.
-
Proposition 3: Same-Sex Marriage Equality. Proposition 3 is a significant step towards formally rectifying a past injustice in California’s voting history. It offers Californians the chance to explicitly reject bigotry against same-sex couples and firmly establish that such discrimination has no place in the state’s Constitution.
-
Proposition 4: Climate and Environmental Projects. While Proposition 4 is a broad $10 billion bond covering a range of climate-related projects—from fire prevention to energy and agriculture—the LA Times believes it is a necessary investment. Proactive spending today on climate resilience is more fiscally responsible than dealing with the escalating costs of climate change impacts in the future.
-
Proposition 5: Lower Threshold for Local Bond Measures. Proposition 5 seeks to lower the threshold required for passing local bond measures from a supermajority of 66.7% to 55%. The LA Times argues this change promotes fairer decision-making on local spending and taxation, preventing a minority of voters from disproportionately controlling community priorities.
-
Proposition 6: End Forced Labor in Prisons. Proposition 6 is about removing outdated language from the state Constitution that permits prisons to compel incarcerated individuals to work under threat of punishment. The LA Times emphasizes that genuine rehabilitation, crucial for public safety, requires providing opportunities for education, skill development, and treatment within prisons.
-
Proposition 32: Minimum Wage Increase. Proposition 32 proposes a modest but impactful raise for California’s lowest-paid workers, setting the minimum wage at $18 per hour starting in January. Smaller businesses would have until 2026 to comply. The LA Times advocates for this measure as a matter of equity, ensuring a living wage is not just a privilege of certain cities but a statewide standard.
Los Angeles Times Recommendations: Vote NO
The Los Angeles Times recommends a NO vote on the following propositions:
-
Proposition 33: Repeal Restrictions on Rent Control. Proposition 33 aims to repeal a state law limiting local governments’ ability to expand rent control. However, the LA Times opposes it due to concerns that its broad language could unduly restrict the state’s ability to oversee and prevent local rent control policies that might hinder housing construction and worsen the housing shortage.
-
Proposition 34: Changes to Healthcare Provider Rules. The LA Times aligns with the assessment that Proposition 34 is a “revenge initiative” driven by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. This proposition seeks to alter healthcare provider rules in a way that appears targeted at undermining the foundation’s tenant advocacy work. The LA Times urges voters to reject this proposition, discouraging the weaponization of citizen initiatives for retaliatory purposes.
-
Proposition 35: Tax on Managed-Care Organizations. Proposition 35 involves complex issues related to taxes on managed-care organizations, Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, federal healthcare funding, and the state budget. The LA Times believes such intricate policymaking is best handled through the legislative process rather than a ballot initiative.
-
Proposition 36: Criminal Justice Reform Rollback. Proposition 36, despite its aims, is seen by the LA Times as counterproductive. They argue it will not effectively address homelessness or crime and will instead lead to prison overcrowding, hinder criminal justice reform progress, and divert crucial funding away from mental health and recidivism reduction programs.
By providing these recommendations, the Los Angeles Times Voter Guide serves as a valuable resource for Californians preparing to vote. Understanding these endorsements can empower you to make informed choices on each proposition.
