Introduction
The digital age has revolutionized numerous sectors, and psychotherapy is no exception. The provision of mental health services online, often termed online psychotherapy or telepsychology, has witnessed significant growth. This expansion brings forth a unique set of ethical considerations that practitioners, educators, and patients must understand. Much like students might use a “Psy 102 Quiz 1 Study Guide Gcu Behaviorism Vs Psychoanalysis” to prepare for exams in foundational psychology courses, professionals in the field need a robust framework to navigate the ethical landscape of online therapy. This article serves as a comprehensive guide, drawing upon extensive research to explore the ethical arguments both for and against online psychotherapy, aiming to foster informed discussion and enhance ethical practice in this evolving domain.
Initially, research focused primarily on the feasibility and effectiveness of online therapy. Now, the discourse has shifted to examining when and how online psychotherapy should be implemented, carefully weighing its advantages and disadvantages [1]. Telepsychology, as defined by the Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists [2], encompasses psychological services delivered via telecommunication technologies, including real-time (synchronous) and delayed (asynchronous) methods such as videoconferencing, email, chat, and mobile applications. The terminology surrounding this field is varied, including terms like telepsychiatry, online counseling, e-therapy, and cyberpsychology, all generally referring to psychotherapy delivered remotely via technology. In this guide, we use “online psychotherapy” as an umbrella term for these approaches.
The rapid advancement of technology, including virtual reality and artificial intelligence, further shapes the future of online psychotherapy. As more individuals seek mental health support online, a thorough understanding of the ethical implications becomes crucial [3]. Informed consent, for example, necessitates a clear understanding of both the benefits and risks associated with online therapy [10]. Uncertainty surrounding ethical and legal issues remains a significant barrier to the wider adoption of online psychotherapy [1], highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive ethical guidelines [11].
This study guide aims to provide a structured overview of the key ethical arguments surrounding online psychotherapy. It is designed to facilitate ethical discussions among professionals, inform the development of ethical guidelines, and empower practitioners to make informed decisions about offering online services. Ultimately, this resource seeks to enable patients to make well-considered choices about engaging in online psychotherapy. This guide focuses on identifying and categorizing the core ethical arguments, rather than quantifying the frequency of their discussion in the literature, to provide a solid foundation for future ethical deliberation.
Methods of Ethical Argument Analysis
To compile this study guide, a systematic literature search was conducted in August 2019 across three major databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. These databases were chosen for their coverage of medical, psychological, and ethical literature.
The search strategy was structured around three core concepts: ethics, psychotherapy, and online. Synonyms and related terms for each concept were identified, and a specific search query was developed for each database, incorporating MeSH terms (PubMed) and Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms (PsycINFO). The search protocol was validated by a subject matter expert librarian at the University of Zurich to ensure its comprehensiveness and accuracy.
Retrieved publications were screened based on predefined selection criteria (detailed in Supplemental Material). Titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles focusing on ethical arguments related to online psychotherapy.
The extraction of ethical arguments involved a two-stage process. JS initially extracted key text passages from the selected publications, grouping them into thematic clusters. JM then independently reviewed the publications and categorized them according to these main themes [Table 1]. Any discrepancies in categorization were discussed and resolved collaboratively to ensure consistency and reliability in the identification of ethical arguments.
Ethical Arguments: Pros and Cons of Online Psychotherapy
The systematic review of 249 publications revealed a comprehensive set of ethical arguments, with 24 arguments identified in favor of online psychotherapy and 32 arguments against it. These arguments are summarized in Table 1 and further elaborated below, categorized by the frequency of their mention in the reviewed literature. For clarity, the descriptions focus on the core essence of each argument, with citations limited to representative publications for each point. Readers are encouraged to consult the original source table [Table 1] for a more exhaustive list of references.
Table 1. Ethical Arguments in Favor and Against Online Psychotherapy.
| Ethical Arguments in Favor of Online Psychotherapy |
|---|
| Increased access, availability and flexibility |
| Therapy benefits and enhancements in communication |
| Client characteristics |
| Convenience, satisfaction, acceptance and increased demand |
| Economic advantages |
| Anonymity and privacy |
| Eliminating barriers to engage in psychotherapy |
| Therapeutic relationship |
| Online teaching and supervision |
| Reducing stigma |
| Patient empowerment and increased patient control |
| Worldwide and cross-border psychotherapy |
| Emergencies |
| Adaptability of services and personalized care |
| Adherence and compliance |
| Opportunities for research |
| Unethical not to provide online psychotherapy |
| Freedom for therapists |
| Enhancing accountability |
| Protection of the therapist |
| Social media |
| Diminishing intimacy |
| Informed consent |
| Prohibition against free market |
| Ethical arguments against online psychotherapy |
| Privacy, confidentiality and security issues |
| Therapists’ competence and training |
| Communication issues |
| Research gaps |
| Emergency issues |
| Informed consent issues |
| Technological competence |
| Absent or incomplete guidelines |
| Legal issues |
| Practicing across borders |
| Patient characteristics |
| Technical issues |
| Payment and insurance issues |
| Therapeutic relationship issues |
| Availability and access issues |
| Identity and verification issues |
| Image, tradition and therapists’ attitude |
| Misuse and harm |
| Boundary issues |
| Comparability to in-person treatment |
| Increased costs |
| Increased liability and litigation |
| Negative influence of technology use |
| Social media |
| Financial gain |
| Loss of therapeutic control |
| Adherence issues |
| Online supervision and teaching issues |
| Dependence and loss of control by the patient |
| Autonomy issues |
| Dehumanization |
| Stigmatization |
The publications are depicted in numbers (for full citation, see References).
Ethical Arguments Supporting Online Psychotherapy
Enhanced Access, Availability, and Flexibility
Online platforms significantly broaden access to psychotherapy, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas, and populations facing barriers to traditional care [12]. Services become available anytime, anywhere, offering greater flexibility for both clients and therapists [13]. This immediacy and convenience can lead to more timely intervention [3] and potentially more frequent client-therapist interaction [14]. Furthermore, online therapy expands the pool of available therapists, facilitating access to specialized care and a wider range of services [1].
Therapeutic Efficacy and Communication Enhancement
Research increasingly indicates that online psychotherapy can be as effective as, or even more effective than, traditional in-person therapy [1]. Various therapeutic approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), have been successfully adapted to online formats [15]. While CBT is often cited as readily transferable, ethical considerations for other orientations, including psychoanalysis, are also being explored [17]. Online therapy serves not only as a viable alternative but also as a valuable supplement to in-person treatment [18], opening avenues for innovative therapeutic models and the integration of online resources like websites and videos [19]. The digital format also simplifies data recording and documentation, allowing for easy review of treatment progress and techniques [20].
Accommodating Client Characteristics
Online psychotherapy is particularly beneficial for clients in geographically isolated areas, those with mobility impairments, or individuals whose psychiatric conditions, such as agoraphobia or anxiety, limit their ability to attend in-person sessions [21, 22, 23]. It appears well-suited for individuals with mild to moderate symptoms [24] and can even offer crucial support in acute crisis situations when immediate in-person care is unavailable [25].
Convenience, Satisfaction, and Growing Acceptance
Both clients and therapists often perceive online psychotherapy as convenient and comfortable [26], primarily due to its flexibility in terms of time and location [27]. Acceptance and satisfaction with online services are growing among both groups [28, 15], leading to increased demand and interest from clients and practitioners alike [29].
Economic Advantages and Cost-Effectiveness
Online psychotherapy presents a more cost-efficient model of care [30], potentially reducing healthcare expenses for clients, therapists, and the healthcare system as a whole [31]. The ability for therapists to reach more clients, especially in underserved areas [32], can help alleviate long waiting lists for in-person treatment [33] and address workforce shortages in mental health [34], particularly in low- and middle-income countries [34].
Enhanced Anonymity and Privacy
The discreet nature of online therapy, where clients avoid being seen entering a therapist’s office [20], can enhance feelings of anonymity and privacy [13]. This perceived anonymity may encourage clients to be more open and less inhibited when discussing sensitive emotional topics [35].
Barrier Reduction and Increased Engagement
By mitigating stigma and other barriers, online psychotherapy can reach individuals who might otherwise never seek traditional in-person therapy [36]. It can serve as an accessible entry point to the mental health system, potentially leading to further engagement with traditional therapy if needed [37].
Robust Therapeutic Relationships
Therapeutic alliances formed online are often reported to be comparable to, or even stronger than, those developed in in-person settings. Online communication can effectively strengthen existing therapeutic relationships [38].
Advancement of Online Education and Supervision
Technology facilitates effective online teaching and supervision, promoting global inter-professional and inter-collegial collaboration [39]. Text-based online therapy automatically generates session records [32], while video conferencing allows for session recording for supervision purposes [40].
Diminishing Stigma Associated with Mental Health Care
Online psychotherapy can significantly reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health services, addressing concerns about privacy and anonymity that often deter individuals from seeking help [41].
Empowering Patients and Increasing Control
Online platforms empower clients by providing greater ease in switching therapists [42], thereby increasing client control over their therapy experience [43]. This shift can foster a more collaborative dynamic between therapist and client [20].
Facilitating Worldwide and Cross-Border Therapy
Online therapy transcends geographical limitations, enabling therapists to serve clients across state lines, national borders, and time zones, reaching individuals temporarily living abroad [19].
Effective Emergency and Crisis Intervention
Online psychotherapy can be a valuable tool for emergency and crisis interventions, offering quicker access to services compared to traditional in-person settings. Clients may also find it easier to disclose suicidal or homicidal thoughts online [19]. Established practices like suicide hotlines demonstrate the efficacy of technology-mediated crisis support [37].
Personalized and Adaptable Care Delivery
Online platforms enable the delivery of services tailored to individual client needs [19], promoting patient-centered care [44] and customized treatment approaches [45].
Improved Treatment Adherence and Compliance
Online psychotherapy can achieve levels of treatment adherence, attendance, and compliance that are as good as, or better than, in-person therapy [46].
Enhanced Research Opportunities
The digital nature of online therapy offers unique avenues for research [32]. For instance, text-based therapy creates automatic written records that can be readily used for research purposes [47].
Ethical Imperative to Provide Online Services
In certain situations, failing to offer online psychotherapy to vulnerable populations in need, such as those in remote areas with limited access to care, can be considered unethical [48].
Increased Therapist Freedom and Flexibility
Online practice can afford therapists greater professional freedom and flexibility, including more diverse professional opportunities and improved work-life balance [49, 50].
Enhanced Accountability and Transparency
Online psychotherapy can enhance accountability for both therapists and clients. Easier record-keeping and transcript availability can promote transparency [51] and potentially reduce malpractice and litigation risks [52].
Therapist Protection and Safety
Online service delivery can mitigate security risks associated with potentially dangerous clients or risky environments [53].
Leveraging Social Media for Therapeutic Benefit
Social media platforms offer unprecedented opportunities for client access, connection, and therapeutic engagement [54].
Reduced Risk of Intimacy Boundary Violations
The physical distance inherent in online therapy can help minimize the risk of inappropriate client-therapist intimacy, including sexual boundary violations [55].
Enhanced Informed Consent Processes
Informed consent can be strengthened through online platforms, allowing for easy access to detailed information, resources, and multilingual translations [56, 57].
Free Market Principles and Service Availability
Restricting online psychotherapy could be seen as limiting trade and infringing on the ethical right to a free market [58].
Ethical Arguments Against Online Psychotherapy
Concerns about Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security
Privacy, confidentiality, and data security are paramount ethical concerns in online psychotherapy [59]. Risks include the use of unsecured platforms or unencrypted communication tools [60] vulnerable to hacking [61]. Technology failures and breaches of confidentiality beyond the therapist’s control also pose significant threats to client privacy [62, 63].
Therapist Competence and Training Deficiencies
Providing effective online psychotherapy requires specialized training in technology-related competencies and online-specific clinical skills. Therapists need expertise in ethical guidelines, legal requirements, and relevant policies in the online context [18]. Traditional in-person therapy skills do not automatically translate to the online environment [32]. Currently, standardized training programs and clear competency benchmarks for online psychotherapy are lacking [64]. Practicing across borders necessitates familiarity with international laws, legal requirements in the client’s jurisdiction, and cultural competence [65].
Communication Challenges and Misinterpretations
The absence of nonverbal cues, particularly in text-based communication, but also in telephone and videoconferencing, can lead to misunderstandings and miscommunication [20]. Missed clinical information due to limited cues can impair diagnostic accuracy and psychological assessment [28]. Email communication can hinder spontaneity and the expression of empathy and warmth [64]. These factors may make online psychotherapy unsuitable for certain therapeutic approaches and clients [66].
Insufficient Research and Knowledge Gaps
Many argue that there is insufficient research to fully support online psychotherapy, particularly regarding long-term effectiveness, efficacy compared to in-person treatment, and outcomes across diverse populations and conditions [30].
Challenges in Emergency and Crisis Situations
Concerns exist about the ability to effectively detect and manage emergencies or crises, such as suicidal or homicidal ideation, when client and therapist are remotely located [67]. Verifying client identity and location in emergencies, addressing technological failures, and navigating cross-border practice further complicate emergency response in online therapy [68, 69, 70].
Complexities of Informed Consent in the Digital Space
Online psychotherapy necessitates a specialized informed consent process that addresses the unique technical and legal aspects of online service delivery [71]. Assessing a client’s legal capacity to consent and their mental capacity to understand the implications of online therapy can be challenging [72].
Technological Competence Disparities
Disparities in technological competence between therapists and clients, as well as discomfort or anxiety related to technology use, are significant barriers [73]. Awareness of both therapist and client technological skills is crucial.
Lack of Comprehensive Guidelines and Regulations
Comprehensive regulatory guidelines, practice standards, and legal frameworks for online psychotherapy are often lacking or incomplete [42]. This is particularly true for global or international regulation of cross-border practice. The absence of specific ethical codes leaves many ethical questions unanswered.
Legal and Jurisdictional Ambiguities
Jurisdictional uncertainties and the scarcity of specific laws governing licensing, certification, informed consent, and cross-border practice create legal complexities for online psychotherapy [74].
Complications of Cross-Border Practice
Practicing online therapy across state or national borders raises numerous issues, including legislative, licensing, and cultural differences [30]. Determining the jurisdiction of therapy (client’s or therapist’s location) is often unclear, raising questions about legal responsibility and professional regulation in case of violations [75]. Therapists may lack certainty about the client’s location, especially with anonymous clients [76]. Cultural differences between client and therapist can lead to miscommunication and misinterpretations [30].
Suitability of Online Therapy for Diverse Patient Populations
Online psychotherapy may not be appropriate for all clients, clinical conditions, or psychiatric disorders [16]. It may be contraindicated for severe mental disorders or clients posing a threat to themselves or others. Client discomfort or inability to use technology can also be a barrier [15].
Technical Failures and Disruptions
Technical difficulties and failures are major concerns, potentially causing frustration, anger, and disruption to the therapeutic process [73].
Payment and Insurance Reimbursement Challenges
Payment structures, reimbursement policies, and billing procedures for online psychotherapy are complex and often unclear [77]. Handling interruptions and technical failures in billing is also an issue. Insurance coverage for online therapy, including malpractice and liability, can be uncertain, especially in cross-border cases [68].
Concerns about Therapeutic Relationship Quality
Questions remain about whether a robust therapeutic alliance can be established and maintained solely through technology [78], and whether the benefits of the therapeutic relationship are diminished in online settings [79]. The absence of nonverbal cues and reduced intimacy are contributing factors [51].
Availability and Access Paradoxes
While technology can create a sense of constant access, therapists cannot guarantee 24/7 availability [60]. Response time delays, especially in emergencies, are a concern [80]. Paradoxically, access to technology and reliable internet connectivity may be limited for individuals of lower socioeconomic status [32].
Identity Verification and Deception Risks
Verifying the identity of clients and therapists online is challenging, raising risks of deception or fraud. For example, therapists may unknowingly treat minors without parental consent [[64](#B64]].
Negative Perceptions and Therapist Resistance
Many therapists hold negative views about online psychotherapy, expressing concerns about its efficacy and potential damage to the profession’s image [1, 58]. Satisfaction and acceptance among therapists can be low.
Increased Risk of Misuse and Unethical Conduct
Unethical, harmful, or abusive behavior may be easier to perpetrate online [81], including unlicensed practice or impersonation of therapists [23].
Boundary Erosion and Professional Relationship Risks
Maintaining professional boundaries can be more challenging in online therapy. The informal nature of online interaction and flexibility of time and location can blur professional lines [26]. Therapists and clients may be tempted to engage in online searches for personal information, further blurring boundaries [82].
Questionable Comparability to In-Person Therapy
The comparability of online psychotherapy to traditional in-person treatment remains an open question. Some worry that online services may deter clients from seeking more appropriate in-person therapy [56].
Potential for Increased Costs
Despite potential cost-effectiveness, online therapy can involve initial expenses for therapists, making services less accessible to some clients [68]. Implementation in low-income countries can be hindered by these upfront costs [83].
Heightened Liability and Litigation Risks
Therapists offering online services may face increased liability and litigation risks, particularly in cross-border cases [29].
Negative Societal Impact of Technology Use
Online psychotherapy may contribute to internet overuse and addiction [47], potentially increasing social isolation [84] and exposure to misinformation [85].
Ethical Challenges of Social Media Integration
Social media use in online therapy introduces new ethical dilemmas, such as friend requests from clients [57] and problematic self-disclosure [18].
Risk of Prioritizing Financial Gain Over Client Welfare
There is a risk that online psychotherapy may be driven by financial gain, potentially compromising client welfare [27].
Diminished Therapeutic Control
Therapeutic control can be reduced in online settings, particularly regarding client location and environment [86, 57].
Adherence Challenges and Drop-Out Rates
Client adherence and compliance may be undermined by the ease of disengagement in online therapy, such as simply logging off or ending a call [87].
Unique Ethical Issues in Online Supervision and Teaching
Supervising and teaching psychotherapy online presents specific and distinct ethical challenges [66].
Client Dependence and Reduced Autonomy
Clients in online therapy may experience reduced control and increased dependence on the therapist or the technology [58, 88].
Potential for Dehumanization of Therapy
Online therapy may contribute to a dehumanized therapeutic environment [89] or be experienced as intrusive and dehumanizing by vulnerable clients [90].
Risk of Stigmatization and Insensitivity
The online setting may inadvertently promote discrimination or cultural insensitivity by obscuring important contextual cues [91].
Discussion: Balancing Benefits and Risks
Online psychotherapy presents a complex landscape of ethical considerations, offering significant advantages alongside notable risks. The benefits are compelling: enhanced access, increased convenience, potential cost-effectiveness, and reduced stigma. These advantages are particularly crucial for underserved populations and individuals facing barriers to traditional care. Moreover, online therapy can be therapeutically effective, foster strong client-therapist relationships, and offer innovative approaches to service delivery.
However, the ethical challenges are equally significant. Privacy and data security concerns, therapist competence requirements, communication limitations, and regulatory gaps demand careful attention. Issues related to emergencies, informed consent, cross-border practice, and client suitability require robust ethical frameworks and practical guidelines. The potential for misuse, boundary violations, and erosion of therapeutic control must be proactively addressed.
This review underscores the need for a balanced approach, acknowledging both the promise and the pitfalls of online psychotherapy. It is essential to move beyond a binary view of “for” or “against” and instead focus on developing ethical guidelines, training programs, and best practices that maximize the benefits of online therapy while mitigating its risks. Just as students diligently prepare with a “psy 102 quiz 1 study guide gcu behaviorism vs psychoanalysis” to understand foundational psychological concepts, mental health professionals must engage in continuous ethical education and reflection to navigate the complexities of online psychotherapy.
This study guide, while comprehensive, has limitations. The review was limited to English and German language publications, although the exclusion of non-English/German articles was minimal. Emerging areas like AI in therapy, robot-assisted therapy, and specific applications for children and families were not exhaustively explored.
Further research is crucial to address the identified knowledge gaps and to develop evidence-based recommendations for practice. Table 2 and Table 3 outline key recommendations for practice and future research, respectively, derived directly from the findings of this review.
Table 2. Recommendations for Practice.
| – Prioritize thorough protection of patient privacy, ensuring confidentiality, and robust data security measures. |
|---|
| – Engage in specialized training to develop specific competencies for online psychotherapy, including technological proficiency and online clinical skills. |
| – Be acutely aware of communication challenges inherent in different online media, such as the absence of nonverbal cues in email-based therapy. |
| – Develop comprehensive emergency plans and protocols, including procedures for contacting local professionals for in-person intervention when necessary. |
| – Implement robust identity verification processes to confirm the identity, age, and location of clients. |
| – Provide clients with clear opportunities to verify the therapist’s credentials, certifications, and professional identity. |
| – Utilize exhaustive informed consent forms that thoroughly detail both the risks and benefits of online psychotherapy, ensuring clients can make truly informed decisions. |
| – Clearly clarify fee structures and insurance reimbursement policies for online services. |
| – Maintain heightened awareness of boundary issues in the online context, proactively establishing and maintaining professional therapeutic relationships. |
| – Offer adequate anonymity and privacy options to reduce barriers to accessing psychotherapy. |
| – Adapt services to meet the specific needs of individual clients, providing personalized care whenever possible. |
| – Actively support and participate in further research on online psychotherapy, particularly in cross-border and cross-cultural contexts. |
| – Advocate for and contribute to the development of comprehensive ethical guidelines and codes of conduct for online psychotherapy. |
Table 3. Recommendations for Future Research in Online Psychotherapy.
| – Conduct systematic research on the efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and comparability of online psychotherapy to in-person psychotherapy across various technologies, mental disorders, and symptom severity levels. |
|---|
| – Investigate the translatability of different therapeutic orientations to online psychotherapy, assessing efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and comparability to in-person settings, identifying necessary adaptations, and evaluating the suitability of different technologies for specific orientations. |
| – Explore the feasibility and ethical implications of specific clinical practices in online settings, such as online prescription, diagnosis, assessment of suicidality or homicidality, and evaluating decision-making capacity for informed consent across different technologies. |
| – Determine client characteristics that are suitable for online psychotherapy and identify contraindications, considering different technology use (e.g., videoconferencing, email), therapy formats (standalone or adjunct), and specific protocols for managing suicidal or homicidal clients. |
| – Research cross-border, worldwide, and cross-cultural online psychotherapy practice, focusing on legal issues, cultural factors, language and communication difficulties, client-therapist fit, malpractice, payment and insurance challenges, and the acquisition of specialized competencies. |
| – Assess the impact of different communication technologies on the therapeutic relationship in online psychotherapy, and investigate new forms of abuse or ethical violations that may emerge in online compared to in-person settings. |
| – Research the additional skills and competencies required for psychotherapists in online practice compared to in-person settings, addressing questions of therapist suitability, training requirements, and the development of appropriate education programs. |
| – Investigate data security issues, focusing on secure communication methods across different technologies, secure data storage solutions, and secure online payment systems. |
Conclusion: Embracing Ethical Online Practice
As online psychotherapy continues to evolve and expand, ethical considerations must remain at the forefront of practice, research, and policy. If trained and ethically-minded psychotherapists do not actively engage in this emerging field, there is a risk that less qualified or unethical practitioners may fill the growing demand [37]. Therefore, it is imperative that all mental health professionals become well-informed about the ethical dimensions of online psychotherapy.
Whether or not therapists choose to offer online services themselves, they must be equipped to provide accurate and balanced information to patients, empowering them to make informed decisions about utilizing online psychotherapy. By proactively addressing the ethical challenges and embracing responsible innovation, the field of psychotherapy can harness the potential of technology to expand access to care and improve mental health outcomes in an ethically sound manner.
Author Contributions
JS and MT designed the review and developed the search strategy. JS and JM were involved in search, exclusion, and argument extraction processes. JS and MT wrote and edited the final article, which was reviewed and approved by JM.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Sabine Klein, expert librarian at the University of Zurich, who reviewed the final search code and provided many useful inputs, and to Jörg Zemp, librarian at the Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, who assisted us in locating the full-text publications that were not directly available.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993/full#supplementary-material
Click here for additional data file. (661.5KB, docx)
References
[References]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Click here for additional data file. (661.5KB, docx)
